![]() Since faculty members may collaborate on the same publication, some publications may have been double-counted. The impact factors of the journal in which these publications appeared was not factored into our calculations. We were not able to determine the total amount of NIH funding in dollars of the dermatology divisions. Using a weighted ranking system, we also tabulated the overall top 30 dermatology programs based on these 5 outcome measures. We used the 5 outcome measures to tabulate the highest ranking programs in each category. dermatology journals and the top 4 subspecialty journals Publications in 2001 to 2004 NIH funding in 2004 Dermatology Foundation grants in 2001 to 2004 faculty lectures in 2004 delivered at national conferences number of full-time faculty members who were on the editorial boards of the top 3 U.S. Data from part-time and volunteer faculty were not used. dermatology programs and their full-time faculty. We collected extensive 2001 to 2004 data ranging from total publications to grant funding on 107 U.S. ![]() To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to rank the dermatology programs on 4 of the following outcome measures of academic achievement and with an overall ranking. ![]() To determine the highest ranking academic dermatology programs based on 5 outcome measures and on an overall ranking scale. The only dermatology rankings in the past were based on National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding and journal citations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |